The official state systems, imposed from Ankara, Tehran, Baghdad, and Damascus, have historically failed to replace Tore . For decades, the host nations pursued assimilationist policies, treating Kurdish customs as backward. Their penal codes—based on French, Swiss, or Islamic models—are designed for individual citizens, not collective tribes. In remote mountainous regions, the state’s courts are seen as distant, corrupt, and linguistically inaccessible (often operating only in Turkish, Persian, or Arabic). Consequently, many Kurds have engaged in legal dualism: using state courts for property disputes or traffic violations, while resorting to Tore for violent crimes or family honor. The state, in turn, has often co-opted tribal leaders as informal magistrates to maintain order, tacitly recognizing customary law as long as it does not openly challenge state sovereignty.
If you mean: 2. An overview of crime and punishment in Kurdish regions (historical/customary law) 3. Or a misunderstanding of a legal text crime and punishment kurdish